<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 24-bit PNG Alpha Transparency Wackiness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrispalle.com/2006/09/26/24-bit-png-alpha-transparency-wackiness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrispalle.com/2006/09/26/24-bit-png-alpha-transparency-wackiness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris PallÃ©</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispalle.com/2006/09/26/24-bit-png-alpha-transparency-wackiness/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris PallÃ©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispalle.com/?p=44#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Thanks for the heads up. I&#039;ll be watching for your post.
It really doesn&#039;t make sense, though. I mean, when I did it for Artisans&#039; site, it works TOTALLY fine. So, what gives for this site?? It&#039;s befuddling, nonsensical, and downright postal-izing. :-) grrrrrr. I really don&#039;t like IE... I may have mentioned that before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Thanks for the heads up. I&#8217;ll be watching for your post.<br />
It really doesn&#8217;t make sense, though. I mean, when I did it for Artisans&#8217; site, it works TOTALLY fine. So, what gives for this site?? It&#8217;s befuddling, nonsensical, and downright postal-izing. :-) grrrrrr. I really don&#8217;t like IE&#8230; I may have mentioned that before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie Jost</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispalle.com/2006/09/26/24-bit-png-alpha-transparency-wackiness/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie Jost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispalle.com/?p=44#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Heh, yeah, I&#039;ve given up on PNG for awhile. In most instances, I&#039;ve found a way to use GIF for transparency and rarely have trouble. Shadows are the tough part. I&#039;ll bet most of your PNG stuff could be done with GIF if you&#039;re creative about it. I&#039;m writing up a thing from the AIGA conference I was at this past weekend in which they talked about specifying colors to be transparent. It has already helped me a bunch in making transparencies. I&#039;ll try to finish that and get it up in the next day or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, yeah, I&#8217;ve given up on PNG for awhile. In most instances, I&#8217;ve found a way to use GIF for transparency and rarely have trouble. Shadows are the tough part. I&#8217;ll bet most of your PNG stuff could be done with GIF if you&#8217;re creative about it. I&#8217;m writing up a thing from the AIGA conference I was at this past weekend in which they talked about specifying colors to be transparent. It has already helped me a bunch in making transparencies. I&#8217;ll try to finish that and get it up in the next day or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

