<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TwerpScan &#8211; Good Name; Good Way to Zap Them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrispalle.com/2008/04/29/twerpscan-good-name-good-way-to-zap-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrispalle.com/2008/04/29/twerpscan-good-name-good-way-to-zap-them/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sedgewick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispalle.com/2008/04/29/twerpscan-good-name-good-way-to-zap-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>sedgewick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispalle.com/?p=121#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>Chris, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I made the analogy to a client today, that my twitter experience was like cultivating a ballroom of people(or voices) and wandering through the constant stream of chatter to become informed, to hear new ideas, to mingle, and to meet random folks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It has been a means to find pace with the evolution of tech. Mainly online social medias. Finding media, good media, interesting content, blogs, ideas, and web-services/apps - was not something I &#039;knew&#039; how to do. But by cultivating my ballroom (via Twitt and now FF), I have meshed into a network of brilliant people actively participating in shaping and strengthening a human web of innovators and critics. It&#039;s really valuable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To maximize that for me, though - it has been about diversity - following a large sample size of folks in order to interface intimately with a greater field of the unknown (when I first logged on to twitter a couple months back.. I had NO idea who anyone was outside of Scoble).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I basically threw a bunch of seeds into the backyard with a bucket, threw some dirt around and watered faithfully. From that sprung some amazing stuff: connections, ideas, and inspiration. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Specifically I have been interested in following people from my geographic region(NYC). This has been great.. it has allowed me to gain a sense of the localized &#039;tech&#039; culture: events, ideas, trends, venues. I&#039;ve learned a lot, met great people, and tapped into a vein of folks I don&#039;t think I could really have gained the connection with otherwise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Shooting from the hip worked for me. I now am learning the skill of balancing one foot in twitter while one in friendfeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, </p>
<p>I made the analogy to a client today, that my twitter experience was like cultivating a ballroom of people(or voices) and wandering through the constant stream of chatter to become informed, to hear new ideas, to mingle, and to meet random folks. </p>
<p>It has been a means to find pace with the evolution of tech. Mainly online social medias. Finding media, good media, interesting content, blogs, ideas, and web-services/apps &#8211; was not something I &#39;knew&#39; how to do. But by cultivating my ballroom (via Twitt and now FF), I have meshed into a network of brilliant people actively participating in shaping and strengthening a human web of innovators and critics. It&#39;s really valuable.</p>
<p>To maximize that for me, though &#8211; it has been about diversity &#8211; following a large sample size of folks in order to interface intimately with a greater field of the unknown (when I first logged on to twitter a couple months back.. I had NO idea who anyone was outside of Scoble).</p>
<p>I basically threw a bunch of seeds into the backyard with a bucket, threw some dirt around and watered faithfully. From that sprung some amazing stuff: connections, ideas, and inspiration. </p>
<p>Specifically I have been interested in following people from my geographic region(NYC). This has been great.. it has allowed me to gain a sense of the localized &#39;tech&#39; culture: events, ideas, trends, venues. I&#39;ve learned a lot, met great people, and tapped into a vein of folks I don&#39;t think I could really have gained the connection with otherwise.</p>
<p>Shooting from the hip worked for me. I now am learning the skill of balancing one foot in twitter while one in friendfeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrispalle</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispalle.com/2008/04/29/twerpscan-good-name-good-way-to-zap-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>chrispalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispalle.com/?p=121#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>Hey Sedgewick, You bring up some really good points. In fact, I would love to hear more about your experiences with this approach. Especially because I&#039;ve met you personally and know you&#039;re not a &quot;twit-bot.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think you&#039;re dragging the system down. You may really be getting a personal value out of this and no, there&#039;s nothing wrong with that. Especially if you&#039;re giving back to the community. And I know you are from our discussions at d.b.a.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And actually, to your point, I don&#039;t always care who follows me, but there are some who are nefarious in their intentions and it is these folks who bother me. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can you please share some of your personal experience with using Twitter in the way you have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sedgewick, You bring up some really good points. In fact, I would love to hear more about your experiences with this approach. Especially because I&#39;ve met you personally and know you&#39;re not a &#8220;twit-bot.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#39;t think you&#39;re dragging the system down. You may really be getting a personal value out of this and no, there&#39;s nothing wrong with that. Especially if you&#39;re giving back to the community. And I know you are from our discussions at d.b.a.</p>
<p>And actually, to your point, I don&#39;t always care who follows me, but there are some who are nefarious in their intentions and it is these folks who bother me. </p>
<p>Can you please share some of your personal experience with using Twitter in the way you have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sedgewick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispalle.com/2008/04/29/twerpscan-good-name-good-way-to-zap-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>sedgewick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispalle.com/?p=121#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>wait a minute here... Am I a spammer then?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My initial excursion into twitter left me with a blank feed. So I had to start following somebody. None of my friends use the service. So I started just following random people. At first I just tracked conversations, then interesting icons, at one point I just started farming Scoble&#039;s list of people he followed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Point is, in a few days I was following some 1200 people - out of almost shere random intuitive clicking. And I had less than 30 people following me. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But that&#039;s how I plugged into the network, that&#039;s how I experimented with the service, that&#039;s how I put my ear to the ground to find out where the herd was. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean yes, maybe I should go backwards now - my interaction with twitter is now pretty much a random jump into the stream to see what&#039;s going on in the main party room. I enjoy and find value in that - but am I dragging the system down?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;None-the-less, the logic is flawed. Who cares if they&#039;re following you - if they aren&#039;t producing interesting tweets for you - unfollow them.. but to block people who have disproportionate follower ratios is like prohibiting people who have low rss subscriptions from reading your blog.. how much sense would that make?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;back to me, am I being a selfish twerp by following so many people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait a minute here&#8230; Am I a spammer then?</p>
<p>My initial excursion into twitter left me with a blank feed. So I had to start following somebody. None of my friends use the service. So I started just following random people. At first I just tracked conversations, then interesting icons, at one point I just started farming Scoble&#39;s list of people he followed. </p>
<p>Point is, in a few days I was following some 1200 people &#8211; out of almost shere random intuitive clicking. And I had less than 30 people following me. </p>
<p>But that&#39;s how I plugged into the network, that&#39;s how I experimented with the service, that&#39;s how I put my ear to the ground to find out where the herd was. </p>
<p>I mean yes, maybe I should go backwards now &#8211; my interaction with twitter is now pretty much a random jump into the stream to see what&#39;s going on in the main party room. I enjoy and find value in that &#8211; but am I dragging the system down?</p>
<p>None-the-less, the logic is flawed. Who cares if they&#39;re following you &#8211; if they aren&#39;t producing interesting tweets for you &#8211; unfollow them.. but to block people who have disproportionate follower ratios is like prohibiting people who have low rss subscriptions from reading your blog.. how much sense would that make?</p>
<p>back to me, am I being a selfish twerp by following so many people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
